
A Sermon by Pastor Tom Lacey . . .
No Dogs allowed
Mark 7:24-30, Preached at Congregational Church of Boca Raton, March 15, 2009
A Texan walks into a pub in
I’m going to tell you right now that our passage is not an easy one. It’s short but there is still so much in it, so much to get your head and heart around. If you heard things that don’t quite make sense, it’s the way it is with this passage. It’s complex because at the same time that we are reading it, reading the words, we are asking questions of it, of the story, questions about Jesus. The immediate question that rings out in our ears is the question was Jesus racist? Now I didn’t say that this is the best question or the most appropriate biblical or Christian question. But nonetheless it is our question. It is our question because this is our context; it is how our world, the woman on the street, our society and culture would immediately, without thinking, judge the value of this story. It is our ethical question, a question of justice, and it is a very legitimate question. After all we know that God is not racist; because we know God doesn’t value one group of humans over another due to race or ethnic background. So if God doesn’t, then certainly our religion mustn’t, and clearly Jesus Christ shouldn’t. So the story, actually Jesus’ comment to the woman, "It is not fair to take the children's food and throw it to the dogs" puts us in an uncomfortable, questioning position.
If we consider Jesus’ life and times, we should remember that when people of Nazareth, where Jesus grew up, talked about the Romans, the Greeks, the Syrians, and the people of Syrophoenicia, the nicest word they would have had for them was Gentile. But there were other not so printable slang and stereotypes that everyone, including Jesus, would have known. Jesus was completely human remember, except for the sin part. Ultimately then, the deepest question that this story brings up for Christians in our world today is whether Jesus could be prejudiced and still be sinless. As we think about him, we may consider ourselves. What is it to hold stereotypes in our mind and heart about other people? Does this make us prejudiced? Or just because we can think in these terms, without wanting to, but we don’t act negatively on these stereotypes, does this free of the charge of being prejudiced, of being sinners in this regard?
In our Gospel today it seems that Jesus has taken his
disciples for a time away west into the area of
Jesus is in
And what does Jesus do? We have
already heard his response, that negative comparison of Gentiles to dogs, of at
best a family pet, sitting by the table begging for scraps from the family. But
what was Jesus really saying? Some have said that Jesus said this because he
first had to train his disciples to take the good news to
Others have said that Jesus said this with a smile on his lips and a glean in his eye, which means he was joking, kidding around, pushing her buttons. Perhaps. I certainly believe he had a sense of humor. But even if this is true it still doesn’t tell us anything important about Jesus or his mission; it also doesn’t tell us why Mark, and Matthew and Luke for that matter, would have put this story in their gospels. It certainly wouldn’t have been included because they wanted us to know Jesus had this type of humor. So what is the point of this story?
In Elizabeth Yates’ book,
Howard Thurman: Portrait of a Practical
Dreamer, there is the story that when Thurman was in
Ralph Keyes in his book “Is There Life after High School?”
writes that Mia Farrow has never forgotten the time every girl but she was asked
to dance. Nor did Charles Schulz of “Peanuts” cartoon fame ever forget that the
yearbook staff rejected every one of his cartoons. Movie actress Ali McGraw
confesses she doesn’t forget the fact that she never had one date in all of high
school. Henry Kissinger is best remembered by his classmates as the kid nobody
wanted to eat lunch with at school. Rejection can be one of the most traumatic
things that can happen to any of us. That is why we find it so out of character
for Jesus to reject anyone. That’s what makes our Scripture lesson of the
morning so difficult to understand.
So what do we learn from this
story? What is happening in this troubling line? Why is this story included? By
saying what he said, by pointing to his own society and religion’s view of her,
Jesus highlights this woman’s “unacceptability,” her difference from him, his
society’s, his religion’s view of her, and therefore God’s view of her.
According to all of these she is not right. She does not belong inside God’s
tent. Now when Jesus makes his comment about children and dogs, he brings all
this out in the open. For anyone to read this story now, there is no sweeping it
under the rug. Of course you may remember that he has earlier dealt with those
not in the good graces of his society and religion. The difference however
between her and these other people with which Jesus made friends and ate meals
was that she wasn’t going to be any different from the person she was when this
started. He doesn’t tell her after the healing, “Your faith has made her
daughter whole. Now go and sin no more.” She hasn’t sinned in the first place.
So what is the point? First, it all starts with Jesus. Jesus knew of the
difference between Gentiles and Jews. In fact, he made the remarkable statement
concerning this, which means that when the next generation, a later generation,
of Christians must face the question of whether to reach out and include a group
of questionables or close the door and exclude them, we know now that Jesus
faced this exact same question in his own life and time, in his own ministry.
His answer must be our answer. This story justifies the earliest Christian
mission to gentiles, to unacceptables, to those not in God’s tent already, to
those who are different and rejected by others even if for what stands as
reasonable, historical, traditional, insightful reasons; this mission to reach
out and include, the one Jesus started, continues. There is no more divine time
to do so than now.
The second point of this story
follows from the first. Jesus doesn’t change the mother so that she is no longer
Syrophoenician. The cure isn’t for her to become like he is so that then he will
cure her daughter. She remains Syrophoenician, just as her daughter does. Nobody
changes, but the daughter is still helped; the spirit is removed. They were
gentiles, they still are gentiles, and they were never wrong to be gentiles.
Someone else being who they are is never a sin in God’s eyes, even if you or we
think it is. Being who you are isn’t a sin. Do you understand?! Being
Syrophoenician, a Gentile, didn’t make someone a sinner in God’s eyes, even if
all of Israel said it did. Being black in skin color or a woman doesn’t either.
Being homosexual does not make someone a sinner in God’s eyes, even if many
others say it does, even if your family says it does, even if most of society
says it does, even if your religion says it does. Because of this story, we know
how Jesus handled this question. Jesus opened the door for all. Jesus included
those who were excluded. Jesus loved them. Jesus loves us.
Return to Sermons (table of contents)
Return to Homepage of the Congregational Church of Boca Raton